What we do

BLOG

Too many cloud apps, not enough focus

5 min read

Most organisations in Ireland and across Europe are already using at least one cloud app. For many SMEs, that might mean accounting in the cloud.

Most organisations in Ireland and across Europe are already using at least one cloud app. For many SMEs, that might mean accounting in the cloud, a CRM in the browser and Teams or Google Workspace for collaboration. EU funded projects rely on shared platforms for document management, reporting and communication.

Over time, those tools multiply. A new project brings a new cloud app. A department trials something for task management. Marketing signs up for another platform to run campaigns. None of these decisions look risky in isolation, yet the result is familiar: subscription creep, duplicated features, confused staff and data scattered across dozens of systems.

Cloud apps are powerful, but without a clear approach they can quietly introduce cost, security risk and frustration. The goal is not to use fewer tools at any price. It is to choose and manage cloud apps in a way that supports your strategy instead of cluttering it.

This article looks at how growing organisations can keep control of their cloud app ecosystem and build a stack that really fits the way they work.

From useful tools to cloud app sprawl

Cloud apps became popular because they are easy to start. You can sign up with a credit card, invite colleagues and get value quickly. That same ease of use is what creates sprawl.

You might recognise some of these symptoms:

  • Nobody is quite sure which cloud app is the “official” tool for storing files or tracking tasks
  • Different teams use different platforms for the same job
  • Staff leave and nobody knows what they signed up for or where their data sits
  • IT or finance teams discover forgotten subscriptions that renew quietly every year

In this environment, the original benefits of a cloud app begin to erode. People waste time hunting for information. Security teams struggle to maintain standards. Decision makers do not have a single, reliable picture of what is happening.

A more deliberate approach does not mean shutting down useful tools. It means stepping back and asking what you are really trying to achieve.

Start with how your business works, not with features

When teams feel overwhelmed by cloud app choices, it often helps to stop comparing feature lists and instead map how work actually flows through your organisation.

For an Irish SME that might include:

  • How leads become customers and how those relationships are managed
  • How finance and operations track orders, projects and payments
  • How teams collaborate on documents, tasks and internal communication

For a European consortium, it might involve:

  • How partners share deliverables and evidence
  • How reporting data is collected and cleaned
  • How communication with stakeholders is planned and tracked

Once those flows are visible, you can identify the moments where a cloud app genuinely adds value and where it simply adds another login. That view becomes your first filter. Any proposed cloud app should have a clear role in one of those flows, rather than existing as a separate island.

Decide what should be standard and what can stay flexible

A common mistake is to either centralise everything or centralise nothing.

If every team can choose any cloud app for any purpose, you lose coherence. If every decision is locked down centrally, innovation slows and people find workarounds.

Most organisations do better with a hybrid approach.

You might decide that there are a small number of standard cloud apps everyone should use for core functions such as file storage, collaboration and customer data. Around that, there can be controlled flexibility for specialist tools in areas such as design, research or project management, as long as they meet agreed security and integration requirements.

The important step is to make those standards explicit. Staff should know which cloud app to use for which job, and who to speak to before adding something new.

Look beyond the monthly subscription price

Earlier blogs may have covered headline costs, but everyday choices about cloud apps still tend to focus on subscription fees. The true cost includes the time it takes to implement, integrate, secure and support each tool.

When evaluating a cloud app, ask:

  • How much training will staff need to use this confidently
  • Does it overlap significantly with tools we already have
  • How easy is it to integrate with our CRM, finance system or other key platforms
  • What happens if we decide to leave in a few years – can we export our data in a usable format

For EU funded projects, there is an additional question. Will this cloud app still be accessible and maintainable after the funding period ends, or are we building critical processes on top of something that may not be sustainable for partners?

Thinking through these points early helps avoid surprises later.

Treat security and access control as core requirements

Every cloud app introduces a new place where sensitive data might live. That might include customer details, staff information, financial data or research findings.

Security is not just an IT problem. It is part of how you choose and manage cloud apps.

At a minimum, you should expect:

  • Strong authentication options, ideally with single sign on
  • Clear role and permission settings so not everyone sees everything
  • Regular security updates and transparent incident communication

Equally important is how you manage access when people join or leave. A simple joiners, movers and leavers process that includes cloud apps can prevent ex staff retaining access and reduce the risk of accidental data exposure.

For organisations working within EU regulatory frameworks, thinking about where data is stored, how it is backed up and how it can be deleted on request is also essential.

Plan for integration, not isolation

One of the biggest advantages of modern cloud apps is their ability to connect.

When chosen well, a cloud app can pass information smoothly into your CRM, accounting tool or reporting dashboard. That means fewer manual exports, fewer spreadsheets and less chance for errors.

When chosen in isolation, each cloud app becomes a separate silo. Staff end up duplicating data in multiple systems, or working offline because integration feels too difficult.

You do not need to connect everything to everything. It is more practical to identify a few crucial integration points that support your most important processes and ensure any new cloud app fits cleanly into that pattern.

For example, you may decide that all lead capture tools must integrate into the same CRM, or that all learning platforms must feed completion data into a single reporting view for funders.

Support adoption as seriously as you support procurement

Choosing the right cloud app is only half the job. The other half is helping people use it in a way that actually improves their day to day work.

That means taking adoption seriously. Short, focused training sessions, simple “how to” guides and clear points of contact for questions make a bigger difference than long manuals. Early feedback loops help you catch issues before they become frustrations.

It can also mean phasing change. Instead of forcing everyone to switch to a new cloud app overnight, you might run a pilot with one team, refine the setup and then expand gradually, learning as you go.

In the context of an EU project, it may be worth nominating “champions” in each partner organisation who can help colleagues with the new tools and relay feedback to the central team.

Keeping your cloud app ecosystem healthy

Cloud apps will continue to evolve. New tools will appear that genuinely can help your organisation, and older ones will become less relevant.

The healthiest approach is to see your cloud app stack as something you review periodically rather than something you set once.

A simple annual check that asks which tools are widely used, which are rarely touched and where there is overlap can often free up budget and simplify life for staff. It also provides a chance to address technical debt, such as apps that only one person understands or platforms that no longer meet your security standards.

When you look after your cloud apps in this way, they become an organised support for your strategy rather than a collection of separate subscriptions.

Handled thoughtfully, cloud apps can offer Irish and European organisations the flexibility and resilience they need to grow, collaborate across borders and deliver complex programmes without adding unnecessary complexity behind the scenes.

Matrix Internet guides SMEs and EU-funded partners in implementing cloud solutions that deliver scalability, seamless collaboration and sustainable operational impact.

FAQs

The main risks are scattered data, unnecessary cost and confusion for staff. When different teams use different tools for the same job, it becomes harder to maintain security, report accurately and support users.

There is no fixed number. The real question is whether each cloud app has a clear purpose, is used regularly and integrates with your core systems. If several tools overlap heavily or nobody knows who owns them, you probably have too many.

Responsibility is usually shared. IT or security teams should assess technical and risk aspects, while operational or business leaders judge whether the tool genuinely supports key processes. Clear guidelines help staff know when to ask for approval.

An annual review works well for many organisations, with more frequent checks during periods of rapid change or after large projects. The goal is to keep your ecosystem tidy rather than waiting until it feels unmanageable.

Yes. Even simple integrations, such as connecting lead forms to a CRM or linking a learning platform to reporting tools, can save time and reduce errors. You do not need enterprise level budgets to benefit from better connected cloud apps.

Stay in the loop New trends, interesting news from the digital world.